Free / Budget Mainstream models 直连 ★ 3.5 / 5

GGWK1 Review: Pricing & Comparison

OpenAI/Claude/Gemini three-family aggregation, ¥0.6-1/USD exchange rate, mainland direct connect

Last verified: 2026-07-04 · Visit official site →

Making sense of the exchange rate: what ¥0.6-1/USD means

Domestic relays typically price in one of two ways: ”¥/USD” or ”¥/million tokens.” GGWK1 uses the exchange-rate model: ¥0.6-1/USD.

Making sense of that number needs a reference point:

  • Official direct connect: OpenAI and Anthropic price in USD, which converts to roughly ¥7-7.5/USD at the actual exchange rate
  • Typical relays: the exchange rate usually falls between ¥1-3/USD, with budget platforms going lower
  • GGWK1: ¥0.6-1/USD, achievable across all three mainstream families

The 0.6-1 range reflects the price spread across different models — flagship models (Opus, GPT-5.5) cost more, while lightweight models (Haiku, Flash) cost less.

Putting the three families to work

The three families GGWK1 covers map to distinct use cases:

Claude family: long-context processing, in-depth code review, analysis tasks that need careful reasoning. Claude typically outperforms similarly priced models in these scenarios.

GPT family: function calling, plugin-ecosystem compatibility, existing projects that lean heavily on the OpenAI protocol. GPT has the richest function-calling documentation and community resources.

Gemini family: multimodal work (joint image + text understanding), tasks that need a large context window (Gemini 3.5 Pro supports a 1-million-token context).

Being able to switch across all three families with a single API key has real value for developers who need to pick a model based on the task at hand.

Integration example

GGWK1 is compatible with the OpenAI interface format:

from openai import OpenAI

client = OpenAI(
    api_key="your GGWK1 API key",
    base_url="https://api.ggwk1.online/v1"  # check the official site for the current endpoint
)

response = client.chat.completions.create(
    model="claude-opus-4-8",  # or gpt-5.5, gemini-3.5-flash, etc.
    messages=[{"role": "user", "content": "Help me analyze the potential issues in this code"}]
)

Who it fits

GGWK1 is a good fit for: individual developers looking for low-exchange-rate access to the three mainstream model families, with no special functional needs (no corporate invoicing, complex usage auditing, etc.).

Not a good fit if: you need documented stability guarantees, need an even lower price (more aggressive options like SBGPT or YKH.AI), or need coverage of 600+ models (AIFast.club and similar).

  • Baidu Qianfan: official Baidu platform, ERNIE model family, enterprise-grade SLA, supports model fine-tuning
  • PoloAPI: balances stability and multi-model coverage, focused on
  • TokenMix: multi-model aggregation, flexible payment options, serves developers at home and abroad
  • Relaydance: specialized relay for Grok and Doubao models, plus Claude and GPT coverage, three payment methods

Quick facts

Pricing modelPay-as-you-go; ¥0.6-1/USD exchange rate; Alipay/WeChat Pay; check the official site for exact pricing
Model coverageThe three mainstream families: OpenAI/Claude/Gemini
Latency / SLAMainland direct connect; actual latency depends on real-world testing
Mainland direct connect直连
Best forDevelopers
Referral programNo public affiliate/referral program found.

Pros

  • ¥0.6-1/USD exchange rate: on the lower end for the domestic relay market, and all three model families are accessible at this rate
  • Coverage of all three major families — OpenAI/Claude/Gemini — meets most developers' day-to-day needs
  • Mainland direct connect, no proxy needed: well suited to the domestic network environment

Cons

  • The ¥0.6-1/USD range is fairly wide — you'll need to check the official site for the exact price of a given model
  • A relatively small platform with limited independent review coverage
  • Stability and long-term operating reliability need to be verified through actual use

Compare more AI API relays

See the full comparison board — filter by price tier, model coverage, and mainland direct-connect status.

Back to the comparison board →