Free / Budget Broad coverage (100+) Proxy required ★ 4.3 / 5

Groq Cloud Review: Pricing & Comparison

Powered by purpose-built LPU chips, among the fastest inference speeds in the world, a generous free tier for open-source models

Last verified: 2026-08-11 · Visit official site →

Why Groq is different

In the AI inference market, most platforms compete on model count or price. Groq Cloud (groq.com) took a completely different path: building its own purpose-built LPU (Language Processing Unit) chip, turning raw inference speed itself into its core competitive advantage.

The bottleneck in traditional GPU inference is memory bandwidth — generating each token requires reading the full model weights from VRAM. Groq’s LPU architecture keeps weights statically resident in on-chip SRAM, completely sidestepping that bottleneck and achieving deterministic low latency: response time stays essentially constant regardless of concurrency.

Real-world numbers: Llama 3.3 70B typically generates at 300-600 tokens/s on Groq, compared to 50-150 tokens/s for GPU inference at a similar scale. For the user experience of streamed output, that’s a qualitative difference — content feels almost “instant.”

Open-source model coverage

Groq Cloud currently covers the following major open-source model families:

Model familyRepresentative versionPricing (input/output, /M tokens)
Llama 4 Scout109B MoE$0.11 / $0.34
Llama 3.370B$0.59 / $0.79
Llama 3.18B$0.05 / $0.08
DeepSeek R2671B MoESee official site
Gemma 327B$0.10 / $0.10
Qwen 2.532BSee official site
Mistral7B$0.05 / $0.10

The free tier includes all of the models above, with a per-minute token quota (typically 6,000-14,400 tokens/min, depending on the model) and no credit card required at all. You can run an entire prototyping cycle or a small personal project at zero cost.

Speed scenarios: when fast actually matters

Groq’s extreme inference speed delivers real value in the following scenarios:

Real-time voice/conversational apps: text starts appearing within milliseconds after the user finishes speaking, feeling closer to a real conversation than a spinner-and-wait experience.

Code-completion tools: 300+ tokens/s means a complete function appears within 0.5 seconds, instead of waiting 2-3 seconds.

Streaming batch processing: for pipelines that need to show intermediate results in real time (like a streamed summary after RAG retrieval), Groq noticeably cuts end-to-end latency.

Where it’s not a fit: ultra-long-context document processing (context window limits still apply), tasks that need Claude/GPT-level closed-source model capability, or production scenarios requiring model customization.

How to connect

Groq’s API is fully compatible with the OpenAI SDK format, so integration cost is minimal:

from openai import OpenAI

client = OpenAI(
    api_key="your Groq API key",
    base_url="https://api.groq.com/openai/v1"
)

response = client.chat.completions.create(
    model="llama-3.3-70b-versatile",
    messages=[{"role": "user", "content": "Please explain quantum entanglement"}],
    stream=True
)

Just swap in your api_key and base_url — no other code changes needed. A VPN is required from mainland China for stable access to Groq’s API endpoints.

Comparison with similar platforms

  • vs. Together AI: both are open-source model aggregation platforms; Together AI covers more models (100+), but Groq’s inference speed is typically 2-5x faster — if speed is your top priority, go with Groq; if you need a wider model selection, go with Together AI
  • vs. SiliconFlow: SiliconFlow offers mainland direct connect, better suited to domestic teams without VPN access; Groq is faster but needs a proxy
  • vs. OpenRouter: OpenRouter has extremely broad model coverage including closed-source models; Groq focuses on open-source + extreme speed — the two serve different positioning

Who it fits

Strongly recommended for:

  • Developers building voice-assistant/real-time conversational products who are latency-sensitive
  • Open-source model exploration that needs fast iteration across different model versions
  • Budget-limited personal projects that still need high-speed inference (make good use of the free tier)
  • Research teams with a deep dependency on the Llama ecosystem

Not recommended for:

  • Business scenarios that must use Claude/GPT/Gemini
  • Domestic production environments (would need a stable proxy)
  • Scenarios that need image-generation models like Midjourney/Flux

Groq Cloud has carved out genuine technical differentiation in the open-source inference space — the speed advantage from its LPU chips isn’t a marketing number, it’s a difference you can actually feel in your code. For developers who have a real need for open-source models and care about speed, Groq is currently one of the platforms most worth testing first.

Information verified 2026-08-11. Free-tier quotas shift with Groq’s policy — defer to the latest limits on the official site.

  • B.AI: full model lineup + USDT crypto payment, privacy-friendly, no real-identity binding required
  • ModelScope: Alibaba’s open-source model community, free inference tier for Qwen/DeepSeek
  • YunWu API: 500+ aggregated models, ¥0.5/USD exchange rate, free daily GPT-4o calls via GitHub login
  • Modal: serverless GPU on demand, extremely simple deployment for custom model inference

Quick facts

Pricing modelFree tier (about 30 requests/min and 6,000 tokens/min per model, no credit card) + Developer pay-as-you-go (roughly 10x higher rate limits, ~25% off token pricing); Llama 3.1 8B $0.05/$0.08, Llama 3.3 70B $0.59/$0.79 per M tokens
Model coverageThe Llama 3.1/3.3/4 family, GPT-OSS 20B/120B, Qwen 3.6, DeepSeek R2, Gemma 3, and other mainstream open-source models
Latency / SLAPowered by LPU chips, TTFT typically under 100ms, token-generation speed up to 500+ tokens/s, far outpacing GPU inference
Mainland direct connectProxy required
Best forDevelopers
Referral programNo public affiliate program found so far.

Pros

  • Purpose-built LPU (Language Processing Unit) chips: token-generation speed is industry-leading, measured at 500+ tokens/s in practice, with extremely low latency
  • A generous free tier: mainstream open-source models like Llama/Gemma/DeepSeek can be called for free (rate-limited)
  • Pricing matches or beats comparable open-source inference platforms — Llama 3.1 8B is just $0.05/M input tokens

Cons

  • Supports open-source models only — no access to closed-source commercial models like Claude/GPT/Gemini
  • Needs a VPN from mainland China, and the free tier's rate limits are fairly strict (production use requires the paid tier)
  • Model selection is relatively narrow, centered mainly on the Meta Llama ecosystem and a handful of curated open-source models

Compare more AI API relays

See the full comparison board — filter by price tier, model coverage, and mainland direct-connect status.

Back to the comparison board →