XJAI Review: Pricing & Comparison
OpenAI-focused, Azure-grouped, attractive pricing at a 0.9¥/USD exchange rate
Last verified: 2026-07-04 · Visit official site →
OpenAI-focused: why some people stick to just GPT
In an era where “every model is available,” a meaningful share of developers still choose a “GPT-only” strategy:
- A mature toolchain: OpenAI’s Python SDK, function calling, Assistants API, and the rest of its ecosystem are the most complete
- Team familiarity: engineers who got into AI development early usually learned the OpenAI API first
- Dependence on specific models: for some tasks (like o1/o3-level deep reasoning), OpenAI is currently the only option that fits
- Internal policy: some companies’ IT policies only permit the use of OpenAI services
For this kind of user, XJAI’s positioning makes sense — it focuses on the OpenAI ecosystem rather than spreading resources across maintaining access quality for a large number of other models.
Azure grouping: when you need it
XJAI offers an Azure-grouping option. Azure OpenAI Service is Microsoft’s Azure-hosted version of OpenAI’s models, and it differs from directly accessing api.openai.com in a few ways:
| Dimension | Direct OpenAI API | Azure OpenAI |
|---|---|---|
| Data storage | OpenAI (United States) | Azure regions (China region optional) |
| Compliance certification | OpenAI internal | Azure’s compliance framework (ISO/SOC2, etc.) |
| Latency | Depends on the node | Azure’s global CDN |
| Best fit | Individual developers | Enterprises with compliance requirements |
Choosing XJAI’s Azure grouping means your requests are routed through Azure’s OpenAI endpoint, giving you a stronger compliance backing.
The real cost at a 0.9¥/USD exchange rate
GPT-5.5’s official price is around $2.5/M input tokens. Through XJAI (at ¥0.9/USD):
- The cost works out to roughly ¥2.25/M (compared to the official USD price converted to RMB at around ¥18/M)
That’s because XJAI isn’t offering a zero-markup direct connection — it’s aggregated purchasing with a certain discount built in. Check the official site for current live pricing.
from openai import OpenAI
client = OpenAI(
api_key="your XJAI API key",
base_url="https://new.xjai.cc/v1"
)
# An o-series reasoning model
response = client.chat.completions.create(
model="o3-mini", # check the official site for the currently supported model names
messages=[{"role": "user", "content": "Solve this problem: ..."}]
)
Information verified 2026-07-04. Check XJAI’s official site for the current exchange rate and supported models.
Related reviews
- 35.AIGCBEST — OpenAI-focused, Azure pricing structure: a comparable OpenAI-focused platform with Azure-based pricing
- SBGPT — Azure-grouped, ultra-low ¥0.4-0.6 exchange rate: a cheaper Azure-grouping option
- GPTAPI.US — a long-stable OpenAI relay: an OpenAI-focused relay with a more established reputation
Related reviews
- Meshs One: an international node for accessing domestic large models from overseas, AI API Gateway architecture
- Poe API: from Quora, a subscription-based multi-model API, quick access to mainstream AI capabilities
- ProAI API: rated by multiple community reviews as the most balanced and trustworthy choice, solving both network access and cost control, with Claude/GPT/Gemini coverage
- Claude API: focused Claude relay, launched April 2026, supports image generation, ¥1 trial credit, competitively priced Opus access
Quick facts
| Pricing model | Pay-as-you-go; exchange rate around ¥0.9/USD; optional Azure grouping; check the official site for exact pricing |
|---|---|
| Model coverage | Mostly the full OpenAI GPT series, with Azure grouping as an alternative |
| Latency / SLA | Mainland direct connect, low latency via Azure grouping |
| Mainland direct connect | Direct connect |
| Best for | Developers |
| Referral program | No public affiliate/referral program found. |
Pros
- An exchange rate around ¥0.9/USD, which is competitively priced among OpenAI-focused relays
- An Azure-grouping option gives enterprise users a more compliant Azure node to choose from
- Focused on OpenAI models, with complete interface coverage including the o-series reasoning models
Cons
- Coverage is mostly limited to the OpenAI series — not a fit for users who need Claude/Gemini
- A relatively small platform, with limited community and documentation resources
- Stability needs to be verified through the user's own real-world testing
Compare more AI API relays
See the full comparison board — filter by price tier, model coverage, and mainland direct-connect status.
Back to the comparison board →