Yinhe API Review: Pricing & Comparison
$0.4 signup bonus, dedicated Claude Code optimization, a good pick for lightweight testing
Last verified: 2026-08-11 · Visit official site →
Yinhe API: starting at $0.4, optimized for Claude Code
Yinhe API’s (api.nf.video) entry strategy is simple and direct: sign up and get $0.4, with no credit card binding and no need to top up first — you can go straight to testing Claude, GPT, and other mainstream models.
$0.4 doesn’t sound like much, but for testing an API integration it’s actually enough for a few dozen to a few hundred calls — verifying your base_url configuration, testing prompt effectiveness, confirming the response format. $0.4 basically covers that work.
Optimization for the Claude Code scenario
Yinhe API advertises optimizations specifically for the Claude Code scenario, which show up as:
- Configuration docs that provide a dedicated Claude Code setup guide
- Connection stability tuned for long-session scenarios (Claude Code sessions tend to run long)
- Response latency tuned for coding-assistant usage patterns
For anyone using Claude Code or Cursor daily, Yinhe API is worth a side-by-side test against comparable platforms.
Connecting to Claude Code
# Set environment variables
export ANTHROPIC_API_KEY="your Yinhe API key"
export ANTHROPIC_BASE_URL="https://api.nf.video" # check the official site for the current endpoint
# Launch Claude Code
claude
For Cursor: go to Settings → Models → OpenAI API Key, enter your Yinhe API key, and set the Base URL to Yinhe API’s address.
Price range
Yinhe API is positioned in the low-price bracket; check the official site for exact pricing. For everyday Claude Code use, it’s worth comparing costs against these platforms: PackyCode (a Claude Code-dedicated community) and WinToken’s ¥113 trial credit.
Yinhe API’s $0.4 bonus suits users who want to test first and decide later — test it, and if it holds up, top up a larger amount.
How to make the most of the $0.4 bonus
The $0.4 you get on signup can cover a complete integration-verification flow:
- Verify configuration: confirm your base_url and API key format are correct (1-2 calls is enough)
- Single-turn conversation test: call a Claude model and confirm the response format matches expectations (about $0.001-0.003/call)
- Streaming output test: confirm streaming mode works properly — especially important for Claude Code users
- Long-context test: send a prompt over 10k tokens and observe latency and any truncation
Once you’ve run through all four tests, you can judge whether the interface quality meets your bar. If it does, decide your top-up amount based on your expected monthly usage.
Information verified 2026-08-11. Check Yinhe API’s official site at api.nf.video for the current signup bonus and pricing.
Related reviews
- No.1-API: a one-stop model aggregation relay, well-organized API docs, a unified entry point for Claude/GPT/Gemini/DeepSeek
- Baidu Qianfan: official Baidu platform, the ERNIE model family, enterprise-grade SLA, supports model fine-tuning
- Laozhang API: a well-known, long-established Chinese Claude relay, priced at parity with official rates, good reputation for stability — a solid first choice if you want to avoid pitfalls
- DawCode: a new 2026 platform, daily check-in rewards, ¥4 new-user trial credit
Quick facts
| Pricing model | Pay-as-you-go; $0.4 signup bonus; dedicated Claude Code optimization; Alipay/WeChat Pay supported |
|---|---|
| Model coverage | Mostly the Claude series, plus GPT models, with optimizations for the Claude Code scenario |
| Latency / SLA | Mainland direct connect, low latency |
| Mainland direct connect | Direct connect |
| Best for | Developers |
| Referral program | No public affiliate/referral program found |
Pros
- $0.4 in credit on signup: test the service directly without paying, a low barrier for trying out the full feature set
- Dedicated Claude Code optimization: configuration tuned specifically for AI coding-tool scenarios, a good fit for Cursor/Claude Code users
- Priced in the low-price bracket, suiting individual developers on a limited budget
Cons
- A relatively small platform — stability under large-scale production volume needs to be tested in practice
- Model coverage is mostly Claude/GPT, with limited choice among non-flagship open-source models
- Limited third-party review and community discussion material
Compare more AI API relays
See the full comparison board — filter by price tier, model coverage, and mainland direct-connect status.
Back to the comparison board →